Drone incursions over U.S. military bases reveal critical vulnerabilities in civilian infrastructure, from airports to energy grids, that experts say remain dangerously exposed.

'She had big googly eyes and was wearing a red hat knitted by one of the careworkers' Emma the Social Robot by Paula Hornickel. 'She had big googly eyes and was wearing a red hat knitted by one of the careworkers' Emma the Social Robot by Paula Hornickel. 'The first resident that Emma - a social robot - was introduced to was called Peter. After that, Emma assumed they were all called Peter, which everyone found hilarious. O ne morning in July 2025, I arrived in the small, quiet town of Albershausen in south-west Germany.

Deep learning (DL) has become a cornerstone of modern machine learning (ML) praxis. We introduce the R package mlr3torch, which is an extensible DL framework for the mlr3 ecosystem. It is built upon the torch package, and simplifies the definition, training, and evaluation of neural networks for both tabular data and generic tensors (e.g., images) for classification and regression. The package implements predefined architectures, and torch models can easily be converted to mlr3 learners. It also allows users to define neural networks as graphs. This representation is based on the graph language defined in mlr3pipelines and allows users to define the entire modeling workflow, including preprocessing, data augmentation, and network architecture, in a single graph. Through its integration into the mlr3 ecosystem, the package allows for convenient resampling, benchmarking, preprocessing, and more. We explain the package's design and features and show how to customize and extend it to new problems. Furthermore, we demonstrate the package's capabilities using three use cases, namely hyperparameter tuning, fine-tuning, and defining architectures for multimodal data. Finally, we present some runtime benchmarks.

Selection bias arises when the probability that an observation enters a dataset depends on variables related to the quantities of interest, leading to systematic distortions in estimation and uncertainty quantification. For example, in epidemiological or survey settings, individuals with certain outcomes may be more likely to be included, resulting in biased prevalence estimates with potentially substantial downstream impact. Classical corrections, such as inverse-probability weighting or explicit likelihood-based models of the selection process, rely on tractable likelihoods, which limits their applicability in complex stochastic models with latent dynamics or high-dimensional structure. Simulation-based inference enables Bayesian analysis without tractable likelihoods but typically assumes missingness at random and thus fails when selection depends on unobserved outcomes or covariates. Here, we develop a bias-aware simulation-based inference framework that explicitly incorporates selection into neural posterior estimation. By embedding the selection mechanism directly into the generative simulator, the approach enables amortized Bayesian inference without requiring tractable likelihoods. This recasting of selection bias as part of the simulation process allows us to both obtain debiased estimates and explicitly test for the presence of bias. The framework integrates diagnostics to detect discrepancies between simulated and observed data and to assess posterior calibration. The method recovers well-calibrated posterior distributions across three statistical applications with diverse selection mechanisms, including settings in which likelihood-based approaches yield biased estimates. These results recast the correction of selection bias as a simulation problem and establish simulation-based inference as a practical and testable strategy for parameter estimation under selection bias.

Supervised machine learning assumes that labeled data provide accurate measurements of the concepts models are meant to learn. Yet in practice, human labeling introduces systematic variation arising from ambiguous items, divergent interpretations, and simple mistakes. Machine learning research commonly treats all disagreement as noise, which obscures these distinctions and limits our understanding of what models actually learn. This paper reframes annotation as a measurement process and introduces a statistical framework for decomposing labeling outcomes into interpretable sources of variation: instance difficulty, annotator bias, situational noise, and relational alignment. The framework extends classical measurement-error models to accommodate both shared and individualized notions of truth, reflecting traditional and human label variation interpretations of error, and provides a diagnostic for assessing which regime better characterizes a given task. Applying the proposed model to a multi-annotator natural language inference dataset, we find empirical evidence for all four theorized components and demonstrate the effectiveness of our approach. We conclude with implications for data-centric machine learning and outline how this approach can guide the development of a more systematic science of labeling.

We present mlr3mbo, a comprehensive and modular toolbox for Bayesian optimization in R. mlr3mbo supports single- and multi-objective optimization, multi-point proposals, batch and asynchronous parallelization, input and output transformations, and robust error handling. While it can be used for many standard Bayesian optimization variants in applied settings, researchers can also construct custom BO algorithms from its flexible building blocks. In addition to an introduction to the software, its design principles, and its building blocks, the paper presents two extensive empirical evaluations of the software on the surrogate-based benchmark suite YAHPO Gym. To identify robust default configurations for both numeric and mixed-hierarchical optimization regimes, and to gain further insights into the respective impacts of individual settings, we run a coordinate descent search over the mlr3mbo configuration space and analyze its results. Furthermore, we demonstrate that mlr3mbo achieves state-of-the-art performance by benchmarking it against a wide range of optimizers, including HEBO, SMAC3, Ax, and Optuna.

Standard decoding strategies for text generation, including top-k, nucleus sampling, and contrastive search, select tokens based on likelihood, restricting selection to high-probability regions. Human language production operates differently: tokens are chosen for communicative appropriateness rather than statistical frequency. This mismatch creates a truncation blind spot: contextually appropriate but statistically rare tokens remain accessible to humans yet unreachable by likelihood-based decoding. We hypothesize this contributes to the detectability of machine-generated text. Analyzing over 1.8 million texts across eight language models, five decoding strategies, and 53 hyperparameter configurations, we find that 8-18% of human-selected tokens fall outside typical truncation boundaries. Simple classifiers trained on predictability and lexical diversity achieve remarkable detection rates. Crucially, neither model scale nor architecture correlates strongly with detectability; truncation parameters account for most variance. Configurations achieving low detectability often produce incoherent text, indicating that evading detection and producing natural text are distinct objectives. These findings suggest detectability is enhanced by likelihood-based token selection, not merely a matter of model capability.

Global feature effects such as partial dependence (PD) and accumulated local effects (ALE) plots are widely used to interpret black-box models. However, they are only estimates of true underlying effects, and their reliability depends on multiple sources of error. Despite the popularity of global feature effects, these error sources are largely unexplored. In particular, the practically relevant question of whether to use training or holdout data to estimate feature effects remains unanswered. We address this gap by providing a systematic, estimator-level analysis that disentangles sources of bias and variance for PD and ALE. To this end, we derive a mean-squared-error decomposition that separates model bias, estimation bias, model variance, and estimation variance, and analyze their dependence on model characteristics, data selection, and sample size. We validate our theoretical findings through an extensive simulation study across multiple data-generating processes, learners, estimation strategies (training data, validation data, and cross-validation), and sample sizes. Our results reveal that, while using holdout data is theoretically the cleanest, potential biases arising from the training data are empirically negligible and dominated by the impact of the usually higher sample size. The estimation variance depends on both the presence of interactions and the sample size, with ALE being particularly sensitive to the latter. Cross-validation-based estimation is a promising approach that reduces the model variance component, particularly for overfitting models. Our analysis provides a principled explanation of the sources of error in feature effect estimates and offers concrete guidance on choosing estimation strategies when interpreting machine learning models.

Asynchronous Bayesian optimization is widely used for gradient-free optimization in domains with independent parallel experiments and varying evaluation times. Existing methods posit that standard acquisitions lead to redundant and repeated queries, proposing complex solutions to enforce diversity in queries. Challenging this fundamental premise, we show that methods, like the Upper Confidence Bound, can in fact achieve theoretical guarantees essentially equivalent to those of sequential Thompson sampling. A conceptual analysis of asynchronous Bayesian optimization reveals that existing works neglect intermediate posterior updates, which we find to be generally sufficient to avoid redundant queries. Further investigation shows that by penalizing busy locations, diversity-enforcing methods can over-explore in asynchronous settings, reducing their performance. Our extensive experiments demonstrate that simple standard acquisition functions match or outperform purpose-built asynchronous methods across synthetic and real-world tasks.

Our design policy successfully achieves amortized intervention design on the distribution of the training environment while also generalizing well to distribution shifts in test-time design environments.